Bob jones university dating policy
What the Decision Says The decision itself expressed support for the religious liberty and free speech rights of those who oppose same-sex marriage.
But the decision does not speak directly to the question of colleges' tax exemptions, and a dissent suggests that religious organizations could be challenged. Kennedy wrote: "Finally, it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned.
But Roman Catholic colleges do not bar people in same-sex relationships from enrolling or being hired.
Its loss would be premised on a historic abandonment of the principles of religious liberty that are foundational to our republic and also would have a profoundly adverse financial effect on religious-based primary, secondary, collegiate and postgraduate institutions," the letter said.The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they have long revered." In a dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the decision's language did not go far enough."Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same-sex marriage -- when, for example, a religious college provides married student housing only to opposite-sex married couples," Roberts wrote. solicitor general, in oral arguments about the case." Verrilli, who was arguing in favor of extending same-sex marriage rights, answered: "You know, I don't think I can answer that question without knowing more specifics, but it's certainly going to be an issue. That statement by the solicitor general has prompted much of the discussion of those who believe tax exemptions could be at risk for Christian colleges.